There is nothing wrong the the FTiq, and I know some of you say you prefer it, but I did find it shorter for my swing. I say that because it is still a beast but doesn’t have the offensive sounds, or appearance we associate with ‘geometric’, technology based drivers. I thoroughly tested all of those clubs above plus a couple more and I just found absolutely nothing wrong with the FT I did look but the local selection was sketchy at best for the FT GolfWRX – the world’s largest and best online golf community. Nice job on the review, but also in the search.
|Date Added:||10 April 2013|
|File Size:||53.1 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The face technology helps a lot, on either model. You probably put more thought and effort into testing stuff out. When I had a drastic swing change fft9 year, it took months for me to start connecting, and I had to change my driver as I launch a lot lower, and have a very rotary not very handsylow plane swing right now.
I had a big swing change this winter, and this is probably going to be it Sure enough we’re looking at a face height of Results showed an ‘average’ of an 11 yard draw on all shots. Thanks for your adjuzt
The thick titanium top line has been reduced and we think this is a style that will appeal to a wider audience than Callaway diehards. Golfers can choose a draw or neutral setting with the driver. I mentioned briefly I had so much trouble controlling it What might not appeal though is the price which is at the premium end of the market and the performance of the club does just enough to justify it, so make sure you get it custom fitted to make the most of your money.
The ‘X’ face technology does work. Sorry for putting doubt into your mind ColinMB.
I am now learning to shape the ball much better calladay this club although I do have a natural draw flight I am now working on my fade and I feel that this driver has the ability along with myself to provide any shot that is required.
Write your review You must enter a review of between and characters. Colin, you know I’m busting your chops my friend!
FT-9 Driver Review: Callaway FT-9 wins for me – Equipment – GolfWRX
Spun a bit too much for me. I hope someone gets something out of this, and I know there’s a lot of great stuff this year Posted 14 February – Your name You must enter acjust name.
This is a personal decision, but I really don’t want adjusr. Unfortunately my testing will have to be done indoors on a sim but I need to feed my golf habit somewhat during the middle of winter by trying some new sticks.
Lots of people love that club. Golfwolf, on Feb 14 Did you get an imix version of the ft-9 or the regular style? The Diablo fairways are so easy to hit. adjst
Callaway FT-9 Driver Review – Golfalot
That last remains to be seen outdoors when the real golf begins. Several functions may not work.
Callaway FT-9 Driver Review
Today is the day, I will search out and test all 4 of these drivers and see which one wins, the numbers comparison and feel will sway me one way or another. I fully admit, if things in my swing change that much, I will go out and buy next year’s technology anyway.
Bottom line; this club looks and sounds super slick, and you might even say a bit conservative considering the market today, but it is loaded with as much tech as any other offering, including raw ballspeed.