Dec 14, Posts: Windows 95 and Mac OS were not supported. My daughter uses the Mac mostly for video editing, no gaming. It should take any low profile AGP 4x card The Rage Pro has very limited digital resolutions in comparison to analog resolutions. But maybe the matrox simply is a higher quality and more professional card than the rage, ATI had bad drivers for the rage for most of the time, afaik.
|Date Added:||1 December 2010|
|File Size:||52.45 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Please login or register. This is NOT just a function of available video memory. Thanks for the replies. I hope it’s not one of the MHz 64MB widescrren. Yorkshire it’s grim oop north Registered: Rik Wang support entechtaiwan.
This late chip was very similar to the Rage II and supported the same application coding. December 29, I had spent over an hour with Mac support without learning what you described. po
Suspicious Activity Detected
Mac identifies ATI Rage pro video card. The chip was basically a die-shrunk Rage Prooptimized to be very inexpensive for solutions where only basic graphics output was necessary. Maybe a Radeon X or GeForce would be best – they were cheap and plentiful in that form factor in In other projects Wikimedia Commons.
Which I usually modify to add xx32 for example. If it’s already XP, either widescreeh not patched to date including Flash, which shipped version 6 with XP or she’s having a horrid user experience.
VOGONS • View topic – Windows 98se ATI Rage Pro & x display.
This site hosts no abandonware. Retrieved from ” https: If a simple registry patch will work, I’d like to give it a try first pri installing something extra. Or just settle for x as the best compromise for this monitor. Though Quartz Extreme is supported, Core Image is not. The processor was known for its well-performing bit color mode, but also its poorly dithered bit mode; strangely, the RAGE was not much faster in bit color despite rave lower bandwidth requirements.
I have seen that PowerStrip allows to customize resolution, but there are quite a few other settings so I do not feel comfortable doing something that no one else has done. And you’re upgrading it?
I actually managed to use a x widescreen resolution with a Matrox Millenium 4MB on my Pentium on Windows It was also seen on Intel motherboards, as recently asand was still used in for server motherboards.
The Rage Pro has very limited digital resolutions in comparison wdescreen analog resolutions.
The problem is age. Look at the Radeon, or cards for more economical choices.
Widescreen resolutions with Radeon 7000?
Will try these when I get a chance – not sure what’s on it now. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Further, the Rage Pro is typically suited for driving smaller digital monitors of 17″, possibly widescdeen. Thanks in advance, Jeff. Anything above a GeForce 4 series or Radeon 9xxx series in low-profile should be good.
The ATI website offers the latest updated driver — dated In all, I think the most economical solution would be to use the in the PC for the DVI output, obviating the need to flash?